schwatzgelb.de das Fanzine rund um Borussia Dortmund
A- A+
schwatzgelb.de das Fanzine rund um Borussia Dortmund
Startseite | FAQ | schwatzgelb.de unterstützen
Login | Registrieren

Chinesischer Think Tank: Possible Outcomes of the Russo-Ukrainian War and China’s Choice (Politik)

Reviewer, Montag, 14.03.2022, 07:27 (vor 1378 Tagen) @ Taifun

Passt ganz gut dazu: Übersetzt aus dem Chinesischen die Perspektive von Hu Wei vom Public Policy Research Center of the Counselor’s Office of the State Council, Shanghai Public Policy Research Association und Academic Committee of the Chahar Institute, also die Sicht eines chinesischen Think Tankers.

uscnpm.org

Der Originalartikel ist in China offenbar zensiert. Nicht überraschend, dass Xi nicht wünscht, dass von seiner Linie abweichende Ansichten zu lesen sind.


Auszüge:

The US and Europe would form a closer community of shared future, and American leadership in the Western world will rebound.
The “Iron Curtain” would fall again not only from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea, but also to the final confrontation between the Western-dominated camp and its competitors. The West will draw the line between democracies and authoritarian states, defining the divide with Russia as a struggle between democracy and dictatorship. The new Iron Curtain will no longer be drawn between the two camps of socialism and capitalism, nor will it be confined to the Cold War. It will be a life-and-death battle between those for and against Western democracy. The unity of the Western world under the Iron Curtain will have a siphon effect on other countries: the U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy will be consolidated, and other countries like Japan will stick even closer to the U.S., which will form an unprecedentedly broad democratic united front.

The power of the West will grow significantly, NATO will continue to expand, and U.S. influence in the non-Western world will increase. [...] China will become more isolated under the established framework. For the above reasons, if China does not take proactive measures to respond, it will encounter further containment from the US and the West. Once Putin falls, the U.S. will no longer face two strategic competitors but only have to lock China in strategic containment. Europe will further cut itself off from China; Japan will become the anti-China vanguard; South Korea will further fall to the U.S.; Taiwan will join the anti-China chorus, and the rest of the world will have to choose sides under herd mentality. China will not only be militarily encircled by the U.S., NATO, the QUAD, and AUKUS, but also be challenged by Western values and systems.

China cannot be tied to Putin and needs to be cut off as soon as possible. In the sense that an escalation of conflict between Russia and the West helps divert U.S. attention from China, China should rejoice with and even support Putin, but only if Russia does not fall. Being in the same boat with Putin will impact China should he lose power. Unless Putin can secure victory with China's backing, a prospect which looks bleak at the moment, China does not have the clout to back Russia.
Given that China has always advocated respect for national sovereignty and territorial integrity, it can avoid further isolation only by standing with the majority of the countries in the world. This position is also conducive to the settlement of the Taiwan issue.

China should achieve the greatest possible strategic breakthrough and not be further isolated by the West. Cutting off from Putin and giving up neutrality will help build China's international image and ease its relations with the U.S. and the West. Though difficult and requiring great wisdom, it is the best option for the future. The view that a geopolitical tussle in Europe triggered by the war in Ukraine will significantly delay the U.S. strategic shift from Europe to the Indo-Pacific region cannot be treated with excessive optimism. There are already voices in the U.S. that Europe is important, but China is more so, and the primary goal of the U.S. is to contain China from becoming the dominant power in the Indo-Pacific region. Under such circumstances, China’s top priority is to make appropriate strategic adjustments accordingly, to change the hostile American attitudes towards China, and to save itself from isolation. The bottom line is to prevent the U.S. and the West from imposing joint sanctions on China.


Antworten auf diesen Eintrag:



gesamter Thread:


1516831 Einträge in 16283 Threads, 14350 registrierte Benutzer Forumszeit: 21.12.2025, 09:21
RSS Einträge  RSS Threads | Kontakt | Impressum | Nutzungsbedingungen | Datenschutzerklärung | Forumsregeln